<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photoshop Abuse?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.youthedesigner.com/2007/12/14/photoshop-abuse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.youthedesigner.com/2007/12/14/photoshop-abuse/</link>
	<description>Graphic Design Blog, Tips, Tutorials and Jobs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:19:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bobby J.</title>
		<link>http://www.youthedesigner.com/2007/12/14/photoshop-abuse/comment-page-1/#comment-8565</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 17:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youthedesigner.com/2007/12/14/photoshop-abuse/#comment-8565</guid>
		<description>I agree, this ad needs to go , enough said</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, this ad needs to go , enough said</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: http://www.acuitydesigns.net</title>
		<link>http://www.youthedesigner.com/2007/12/14/photoshop-abuse/comment-page-1/#comment-2780</link>
		<dc:creator>http://www.acuitydesigns.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 02:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youthedesigner.com/2007/12/14/photoshop-abuse/#comment-2780</guid>
		<description>Thats crazy. But then again, if you belive thats possible....wow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats crazy. But then again, if you belive thats possible&#8230;.wow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mchilly</title>
		<link>http://www.youthedesigner.com/2007/12/14/photoshop-abuse/comment-page-1/#comment-2759</link>
		<dc:creator>Mchilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 08:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youthedesigner.com/2007/12/14/photoshop-abuse/#comment-2759</guid>
		<description>This is way too far from the original images. Total abuse and very much exagerated!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is way too far from the original images. Total abuse and very much exagerated!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brain</title>
		<link>http://www.youthedesigner.com/2007/12/14/photoshop-abuse/comment-page-1/#comment-2708</link>
		<dc:creator>Brain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youthedesigner.com/2007/12/14/photoshop-abuse/#comment-2708</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with everything that has been said above.
But what about the age old advice of &quot;buyer beware&quot;, or &quot;if itâ€™s too good to be true, it probably is&quot;.  Does the consumer not also have a responsibility in the matter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with everything that has been said above.<br />
But what about the age old advice of &#8220;buyer beware&#8221;, or &#8220;if itâ€™s too good to be true, it probably is&#8221;.  Does the consumer not also have a responsibility in the matter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://www.youthedesigner.com/2007/12/14/photoshop-abuse/comment-page-1/#comment-2624</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youthedesigner.com/2007/12/14/photoshop-abuse/#comment-2624</guid>
		<description>Funny, I started to read this story headline before actually opening it and looking at the pics... this EXACT ad came to mind before I even got a chance to see the whole article. I HATE this TERRIBLE photoshop work!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, I started to read this story headline before actually opening it and looking at the pics&#8230; this EXACT ad came to mind before I even got a chance to see the whole article. I HATE this TERRIBLE photoshop work!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gino</title>
		<link>http://www.youthedesigner.com/2007/12/14/photoshop-abuse/comment-page-1/#comment-1931</link>
		<dc:creator>Gino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youthedesigner.com/2007/12/14/photoshop-abuse/#comment-1931</guid>
		<description>At least for me It would be easier to take them out. I think its a bit harder to make realistic looking wrinkles or blend wrinkles in from another face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least for me It would be easier to take them out. I think its a bit harder to make realistic looking wrinkles or blend wrinkles in from another face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Cass</title>
		<link>http://www.youthedesigner.com/2007/12/14/photoshop-abuse/comment-page-1/#comment-1908</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Cass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youthedesigner.com/2007/12/14/photoshop-abuse/#comment-1908</guid>
		<description>That is defo way over the top. It reminds me of that photoshop dove ad if you have seen it. Do you think it would be easier to take out wrinkles or add them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is defo way over the top. It reminds me of that photoshop dove ad if you have seen it. Do you think it would be easier to take out wrinkles or add them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gino</title>
		<link>http://www.youthedesigner.com/2007/12/14/photoshop-abuse/comment-page-1/#comment-1887</link>
		<dc:creator>Gino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 02:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youthedesigner.com/2007/12/14/photoshop-abuse/#comment-1887</guid>
		<description>Well said Michael!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Michael!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.youthedesigner.com/2007/12/14/photoshop-abuse/comment-page-1/#comment-1886</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 02:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youthedesigner.com/2007/12/14/photoshop-abuse/#comment-1886</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s interesting and true that companies try to dupe consumers with effects. I believe this does fall into the realm of design ethics in a way. Certainly we must be paid for the work that we do, but does a designer really want to be a part of this. I don&#039;t mind the occasional air brush in Vanity Fair, but I think this may cross that invisible line of ethical design and just trying to make a buck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s interesting and true that companies try to dupe consumers with effects. I believe this does fall into the realm of design ethics in a way. Certainly we must be paid for the work that we do, but does a designer really want to be a part of this. I don&#8217;t mind the occasional air brush in Vanity Fair, but I think this may cross that invisible line of ethical design and just trying to make a buck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gino</title>
		<link>http://www.youthedesigner.com/2007/12/14/photoshop-abuse/comment-page-1/#comment-1805</link>
		<dc:creator>Gino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 05:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youthedesigner.com/2007/12/14/photoshop-abuse/#comment-1805</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments guys. Some one mentioned to me that if you look closely on the left in a very small font they write simulated imagery.

I didn&#039;t even notice this and I think that was the point. Make it so unnoticeable and SIDEWAYS so no one will read it yet it will save them from any legal problems.

Reminds me of the small print on TV commercials that is so small its impossible to read, yet it some how works as a disclaimer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments guys. Some one mentioned to me that if you look closely on the left in a very small font they write simulated imagery.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t even notice this and I think that was the point. Make it so unnoticeable and SIDEWAYS so no one will read it yet it will save them from any legal problems.</p>
<p>Reminds me of the small print on TV commercials that is so small its impossible to read, yet it some how works as a disclaimer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suz</title>
		<link>http://www.youthedesigner.com/2007/12/14/photoshop-abuse/comment-page-1/#comment-1796</link>
		<dc:creator>suz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 03:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youthedesigner.com/2007/12/14/photoshop-abuse/#comment-1796</guid>
		<description>Some company advertising mascara with models wearing false eyelashes recently got sued, but this is much worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some company advertising mascara with models wearing false eyelashes recently got sued, but this is much worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.youthedesigner.com/2007/12/14/photoshop-abuse/comment-page-1/#comment-1787</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 00:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youthedesigner.com/2007/12/14/photoshop-abuse/#comment-1787</guid>
		<description>im sick of this ad..its so misleading and false.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im sick of this ad..its so misleading and false.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: del4yo</title>
		<link>http://www.youthedesigner.com/2007/12/14/photoshop-abuse/comment-page-1/#comment-1782</link>
		<dc:creator>del4yo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 22:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youthedesigner.com/2007/12/14/photoshop-abuse/#comment-1782</guid>
		<description>A an Photoshop artist myself, I find really interesting finding that the wrickles were added in Photoshop, not removed. Hair, eyes, and cheeks stay the one of young person. 

It&#039;s weird!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A an Photoshop artist myself, I find really interesting finding that the wrickles were added in Photoshop, not removed. Hair, eyes, and cheeks stay the one of young person. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s weird!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.youthedesigner.com/2007/12/14/photoshop-abuse/comment-page-1/#comment-1772</link>
		<dc:creator>rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youthedesigner.com/2007/12/14/photoshop-abuse/#comment-1772</guid>
		<description>Wow... this is over the top. I definitely agree that it is false advertising. If photoshop was involved in working on this woman&#039;s face, while the advertisment is promoting a product that will have those effects is most certainly misleading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230; this is over the top. I definitely agree that it is false advertising. If photoshop was involved in working on this woman&#8217;s face, while the advertisment is promoting a product that will have those effects is most certainly misleading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sophie</title>
		<link>http://www.youthedesigner.com/2007/12/14/photoshop-abuse/comment-page-1/#comment-1771</link>
		<dc:creator>sophie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youthedesigner.com/2007/12/14/photoshop-abuse/#comment-1771</guid>
		<description>yeah, I&#039;ve seen that one...I hate it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, I&#8217;ve seen that one&#8230;I hate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
